A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out involving possible neighbours more than the development of a wall in a coastal internet site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a case which includes attracted nationwide focus next an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed household residence at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental issues, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Moments post about René Collier and the Irish Moments article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a neighborhood disagreement has evolved into a remarkably publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over building works at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a company director respectively, search for to construct their household property. The case has become emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, exactly where advancement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded inhabitants. According to the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting built by their prospective neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted beneath organizing permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each inhabitants of Dublin Road, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing authorization by building a wall further than the boundaries of their web page, bringing about an encroachment on a Special Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, therefore regions are topic to rigid controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, particularly inside of a sensitive coastal natural environment including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach of their arranging permission, and say the wall, which can be partly constructed, is in the correct posture. Their legal group has characterised the motion being an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful growth. The few accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding in an effort to protect their look at, an allegation which has been repeated in courtroom and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal organizing disputes, where by views of the sea are both of those remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained remarkable attempts by the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the location, In keeping with sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded via waistline-significant drinking water during a storm to photograph the website Irish Occasions, a picture which includes since come to be emblematic with the depth with the dispute. These actions were not basically symbolic; they had been meant to Acquire Visible proof in the wall’s posture relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website in the sea Irish Periods claimed, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the water through intense climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm drinking water to photograph the positioning turned Probably the most putting descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Periods short article about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that such actions have been cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was being encroached upon.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being protected in detail by the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become broadly searched phrases as audience sought to know the history and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court heard even more submissions on whether or not interim orders really should be granted to halt design pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important moment within the lawful timeline.
With the Main on the dispute is a disagreement above boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain that the wall, as created, goes over and above what was authorised and intrudes into protected land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has been referred to as meticulous in his assessment of organizing paperwork, maps, and problems connected on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two stressed that their motion is motivated by concern for environmental protection and adherence to arranging regulation. They reject statements that the case is about preserving a private see, insisting alternatively that it's about making certain that growth at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they've got described their long-standing link to the area as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Paul Feely accountant Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair merely attempting to create a spouse and children property in accordance Using the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches on a Distinctive Region of Conservation and say that each one is effective have already been performed dependant on Qualified guidance and accredited designs. Their legal professionals have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the spectacular actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with entering The ocean for the duration of a storm, don't change the fundamental specifics.
The case has also elevated broader questions about how planning disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute around development of wall at coastal website happens to be a shorthand description for a situation that a lot of observers see as more and more widespread. As sea amounts rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation amongst personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is now extra contentious.
The Irish Occasions write-up about René Collier mentioned which the businessman had Formerly been linked to regional advocacy on preparing and environmental issues, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from quite diverse Experienced backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location with the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of waist-higher drinking water throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Times and René Collier waded by means of midsection-high water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in coverage, reflecting equally the Bodily fact on the coastline and also the symbolic mother nature from the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme technique.
As being the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be uncertain. The courtroom have to ascertain if the wall as created complies with setting up authorization and no matter whether any encroachment right into a Distinctive Area of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and setting up ailments. However the human aspect remains central: neighbours who must Are living alongside one another very long following the lawful expenditures are paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over development operates at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, although the implications of the case increase over and above that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the value of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. Furthermore, it underscores how rapidly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when fundamental troubles such as environmental safety and assets rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a spot of purely natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre from the dispute stands partially designed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Irrespective of whether it's going to in the long run be altered, eradicated, or finished as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s results. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will most likely proceed to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to The most carefully viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin lately.